Ray Ford Ray Ford's Profile Page

Ray Ford Ray Ford

0 Course Enrolled • 0 Course Completed

Biography

Free PDF 2025 VMware 2V0-13.24: Marvelous VMware Cloud Foundation 5.2 Architect Premium Files

Perhaps you have wasted a lot of time to playing games. It doesn't matter. It is never too late to change. There is no point in regretting for the past. Our 2V0-13.24 exam materials can help you get the your desired 2V0-13.24 certification. You will change a lot after learning our 2V0-13.24 Study Materials. Also, you will have a positive outlook on life. All in all, abandon all illusions and face up to reality bravely. Our 2V0-13.24 practice exam will be your best assistant. You are the best and unique in the world. Just be confident to face new challenge!

VMware 2V0-13.24 Exam Syllabus Topics:

Topic
Details

Topic 1

Troubleshoot and Optimize the VMware by Broadcom Solution: This section has NO TESTABLE OBJECTIVES in this version of the exam.

Topic 2

Install, Configure, and Administrate the VMware by Broadcom Solution: This section has NO TESTABLE OBJECTIVES in this version of the exam.

Topic 3

IT Architectures, Technologies, Standards: This section of the exam measures the skills of enterprise architects and solution architects and focuses on the fundamentals of IT architectures, technologies, and standards. It covers differentiating between business and technical requirements, understanding conceptual models, and logical and physical designs, and recognizing the distinctions between requirements, assumptions, constraints, and risks. Also included are availability, manageability, performance, recoverability, and security (AMPRS), developing risk mitigation strategies, documenting design decisions, and creating design validation strategies.

Topic 4

VMware by Broadcom Solution: This section of the exam measures the skills of cloud architects and infrastructure engineers and focuses on understanding the architecture of VMware by Broadcom solution. Candidates should be able to differentiate between various VMware Cloud Foundation architecture options based on different scenarios.

Topic 5

Plan and Design the VMware by Broadcom Solution: This section of the exam measures the skills of VMware administrators. It involves gathering and analyzing business objectives and requirements to create a conceptual model. Additionally, it covers the creation of VMware Cloud Foundation logical and physical designs. This includes prerequisites and design decisions related to Network Infrastructure, VCF Management Domain, VCF Workload Domain, VCF Edge Cluster, VCF Cloud Automation, and VCF Cloud Operations. Designs should consider availability within and across availability zones, manageability (Lifecycle Management, Scalability, Capacity Management), performance, recoverability (BCDR strategies), and security for VCF Management Components and Workloads. Workload mobility, consumption, and monitoring strategies are also addressed in this section.

>> 2V0-13.24 Premium Files <<

Valid 2V0-13.24 Exam Forum, 2V0-13.24 Reliable Exam Price

The language in our VMware 2V0-13.24 test guide is easy to understand that will make any learner without any learning disabilities, whether you are a student or a in-service staff, whether you are a novice or an experienced staff who has abundant experience for many years. It should be a great wonderful idea to choose our 2V0-13.24 Guide Torrent for sailing through the difficult test.

VMware Cloud Foundation 5.2 Architect Sample Questions (Q61-Q66):

NEW QUESTION # 61
An architect is documenting the design for a new VMware Cloud Foundation solution. During workshops with key stakeholders, the architect discovered that some of the workloads that will be hosted within the Workload Domains will need to be connected to an existing Fibre Channel storage array. How should the architect document this information within the design?

A. As an assumption
B. As a design decision
C. As a business requirement
D. As a constraint

Answer: D

Explanation:
In VMware Cloud Foundation (VCF) 5.2, design documentation categorizes information into requirements, assumptions, constraints, risks, and decisions to guide the solution's implementation. The need for workloads in VI Workload Domains to connect to an existing Fibre Channel (FC) storage array has specific implications.
Let's analyze how this should be classified:
Option A: As an assumptionAn assumption is a statement taken as true without proof, typically used when information is uncertain or unverified. The scenario states that the architectdiscoveredthis need during workshops with stakeholders, implying it's a confirmed fact, not a guess. Documenting it as an assumption (e.
g., "We assume workloads need FC storage") would understate its certainty and misrepresent its role in the design process. This option is incorrect.
Option B: As a constraintThis is the correct answer. Aconstraintis a limitation or restriction that influences the design, often imposed by existing infrastructure, policies, or resources. The requirement to use an existing FC storage array limits the storage options for the VI Workload Domains, as VCF natively uses vSAN as the principal storage for workload domains. Integrating FC storage introduces additional complexity (e.g., FC zoning, HBA configuration) and restricts the design from relying solely on vSAN. In VCF 5.2, external storage like FC is supported via supplemental storage for VI Workload Domains, but it's a deviation from the default architecture, making it a constraint imposed by the environment. Documenting it as such ensures it's accounted for in planning and implementation.
Option C: As a design decisionA design decision is a deliberate choice made by the architect to meet requirements (e.g., "We will use FC storage over iSCSI"). Here, the need for FC storage is a stakeholder- provided fact, not a choice the architect made. The decision tosupportFC storage might follow, but the initial discovery is a pre-existing condition, not the decision itself. Classifying it as a design decision skips the step of recognizing it as a design input, making this option incorrect.
Option D: As a business requirementA business requirement defineswhatthe organization needs to achieve (e.g., "Workloads must support 99.9% uptime"). While the FC storage need relates to workloads, it's a technical specification abouthowconnectivity is achieved, not a high-level business goal. Business requirements typically originate from organizational objectives, not infrastructure details discovered in workshops. This option is too broad and misaligned with the technical nature of the information, making it incorrect.
Conclusion:The need to connect workloads to an existing FC storage array is aconstraint(Option B) because it limits the storage design options for the VI Workload Domains and reflects an existing environmental factor. In VCF 5.2, this would influence the architect to plan for Fibre Channel HBAs, external storage configuration, and compatibility with vSphere, documenting it as a constraint ensures these considerations are addressed.
References:
VMware Cloud Foundation 5.2 Architecture and Deployment Guide (Section: VI Workload Domain Storage Options) VMware Cloud Foundation 5.2 Planning and Preparation Guide (Section: Design Constraints and Assumptions) vSphere 7.0U3 Storage Guide (integrated in VCF 5.2): External Storage Integration

NEW QUESTION # 62
Which tool is used to generate support logs for troubleshooting in VMware Cloud Foundation?
Response:

A. VMware vCenter Server
B. VMware vSphere CLI
C. VMware vRealize Operations
D. VMware Cloud Foundation Lifecycle Manager

Answer: D

NEW QUESTION # 63
During a requirements gathering workshop, several Business and Technical requirements were captured from the customer. Which requirement is classified as a Technical Requirement?

A. The system must support 5,000 concurrent users.
B. Reduce system processing time for service requests by 25%.
C. Increase customer satisfaction by 15%.
D. Expand market reach to include new geographical regions.

Answer: A

Explanation:
In VMware Cloud Foundation (VCF) architecture, requirements are categorized as Business or Technical based on their focus. Technical requirements specify measurable system capabilities or constraints, directly influencing design decisions for infrastructure components like compute, storage, or networking. Business requirements, conversely, focus on organizational goals or outcomes that IT supports. Option B, "The system must support 5,000 concurrent users," is a technical requirement because it defines a specific system capacity metric (concurrent users), which directly impacts scalability and resource allocation in VCF design, such as the sizing of workload domains or NSX configurations. Option A, "Reduce system processing time for service requests by 25%," could be technical but is often a derivative of a business goal (efficiency), making it less explicitly technical in this context. Options C and D, focusing on customer satisfaction and market reach, are clearly business-oriented, tied to organizational outcomes rather than system specifications.

NEW QUESTION # 64
An architect has been asked to recommend a solution for a mission-critical application running on a single virtual machine to ensure consistent performance. The virtual machine operates within a vSphere cluster of four ESXi hosts, sharing resources with other production virtual machines. There is no additional capacity available. What should the architect recommend?

A. Add additional ESXi hosts to the current cluster.
B. Create a new vSphere Cluster and migrate the mission-critical virtual machine to it.
C. Use CPU and memory limits for the mission-critical virtual machine.
D. Use CPU and memory reservations for the mission-critical virtual machine.

Answer: D

Explanation:
In VMware vSphere, ensuring consistent performance for a mission-critical virtual machine (VM) in a resource-constrained environment requires guaranteeing that the VM receives the necessary CPU and memory resources, even when the cluster is under contention. The scenario specifies that the VM operates in a four- host vSphere cluster with no additional capacity available, meaning options that require adding resources (like D) or creating a new cluster (like C) are not feasible without additional hardware, which isn't an option here.
Option A: Use CPU and memory reservationsReservations in vSphere guarantee a minimum amount of CPU and memory resources for a VM, ensuring that these resources are always available, even during contention. For a mission-critical application, this is the most effective way to ensure consistent performance because it prevents other VMs from consuming resources allocated to this VM. According to theVMware Cloud Foundation 5.2 Architectural Guide, reservations are recommended for workloads requiring predictable performance, especially in environments where resource contention is a risk (e.g., 90% utilization scenarios). This aligns with VMware's best practices for mission-critical workloads.
Option B: Use CPU and memory limitsLimits cap the maximum CPU and memory a VM can use, which could starve the mission-critical VM of resources when it needs to scale up to meet demand. This would degrade performance rather than ensure consistency, making it an unsuitable choice. ThevSphere Resource Management Guide(part of VMware's documentation suite) advises against using limits for performance- critical VMs unless the goal is to restrict resource usage, not guarantee it.
Option C: Create a new vSphere Cluster and migrate the mission-critical virtual machine to itCreating a new cluster implies additional hardware or reallocation of existing hosts, but the question states there is no additional capacity. Without available resources, this option is impractical in the given scenario.
Option D: Add additional ESXi hosts to the current clusterWhile adding hosts would increase capacity and potentially reduce contention, the lack of additional capacity rules this out as a viable recommendation without violating the scenario constraints.
Thus,Ais the best recommendation as it leverages vSphere's resource management capabilities to ensure consistent performance without requiring additional hardware.References:
VMware Cloud Foundation 5.2 Architectural Guide(docs.vmware.com): Section on Resource Management for Workload Domains.
vSphere Resource Management Guide(docs.vmware.com): Chapter on Configuring Reservations, Limits, and Shares.

NEW QUESTION # 65
An architect is working on a leaf-spine design requirement for NSX Federation in VMware Cloud Foundation. Which recommendation should the architect document?

A. Jumbo frames on the components of the physical network between the VMware Cloud Foundation instances.
B. Layer 3 device that supports OSPF.
C. Use a physical network that is configured for EIGRP routing adjacency.
D. Ensure that the latency between VMware Cloud Foundation instances that are connected in an NSX Federation is less than 1500 ms.

Answer: A

Explanation:
NSX Federation in VMware Cloud Foundation (VCF) 5.2 extends networking and security across multiple VCF instances (e.g., across data centers) using a leaf-spine underlay network. The architect must recommend a physical network design that supports this. Let's evaluate:
Option A: Use a physical network that is configured for EIGRP routing adjacency Enhanced Interior Gateway Routing Protocol (EIGRP) is a Cisco-proprietary routing protocol. NSX Federation requires a Layer 3 underlay with dynamic routing (e.g., BGP, OSPF), but EIGRP isn't a VMware- recommended standard for NSX leaf-spine designs. BGP is preferred for its scalability and interoperability in NSX-T 3.2 (used in VCF 5.2). This option is not optimal.
Option B: Layer 3 device that supports OSPF
Open Shortest Path First (OSPF) is a supported routing protocol for NSX underlays, alongside BGP. A Layer
3 device with OSPF could work in a leaf-spine topology, but VMware documentation emphasizes BGP as the primary choice for NSX Federation due to its robustness in multi-site scenarios. OSPF is valid but not the strongest recommendation for Federation-specific designs.
Option C: Ensure that the latency between VMware Cloud Foundation instances that are connected in an NSX Federation is less than 1500 ms NSX Federation requires low latency between sites for control plane consistency (Global Manager to Local Managers). The maximum supported latency is 150 ms (not 1500 ms), per VMware specs. 1500 ms (1.5 seconds) is far too high and would disrupt Federation operations, making this incorrect.
Option D: Jumbo frames on the components of the physical network between the VMware Cloud Foundation instances This is correct. NSX Federation relies on NSX-T overlay traffic (Geneve encapsulation) across sites, which benefits from jumbo frames (MTU # 9000) to reduce fragmentation and improve performance. In a leaf-spine design, enabling jumbo frames on all physical network components (switches, routers) between VCF instances ensures efficient transport of tunneled traffic (e.g., for stretched networks). VMware strongly recommends this for NSX underlays, making it the best recommendation.
Conclusion:The architect should documentD: Jumbo frames on the components of the physical network between the VMware Cloud Foundation instances. This aligns with VCF 5.2 and NSX Federation's leaf- spine design requirements for optimal performance and scalability.
References:
VMware Cloud Foundation 5.2 Architecture and Deployment Guide (Section: NSX Federation Networking) NSX-T 3.2 Reference Design (integrated in VCF 5.2): Leaf-Spine Underlay Requirements VMware NSX-T 3.2 Installation Guide: Jumbo Frame Recommendations

NEW QUESTION # 66
......

2V0-13.24 dump at Pass4cram are always kept up to date. Every addition or subtraction of 2V0-13.24 exam questions in the exam syllabus is updated in our brain dumps instantly. Practice on real 2V0-13.24 exam questions and we have provided their answers too for your convenience. If you put just a bit of extra effort, you can score the highest possible score in the Real 2V0-13.24 Exam because our 2V0-13.24 exam preparation dumps are designed for the best results.

Valid 2V0-13.24 Exam Forum: https://www.pass4cram.com/2V0-13.24_free-download.html

Ray Ford Ray Ford

Biography

ABOUT

Pages

Contact