Mark Green Mark Green's Profile Page

Mark Green Mark Green

0 Course Enrolled • 0 Course Completed

Biography

最新のNSK300資料勉強 &合格スムーズNSK300試験参考書 |信頼的なNSK300日本語版トレーリング

周りの多くの人は全部Netskope NSK300資格認定試験にパースしまして、彼らはどのようにできましたか。今には、あなたにPassTestを教えさせていただけませんか。我々社サイトのNetskope NSK300問題庫は最新かつ最完備な勉強資料を有して、あなたに高品質のサービスを提供するのはNSK300資格認定試験の成功にとって唯一の選択です。躊躇わなくて、PassTestサイト情報を早く了解して、あなたに試験合格を助かってあげますようにお願いいたします。

NSK300試験資料の更新は1年以内に無料で提供され、1年後にクライアントは50％の割引を受けることができます。古いクライアントは、NSK300のNetskope試験トレントを購入すると、特定の割引を利用できます。当社の専門家は、テストバンクの更新が毎日あるかどうかを確認し、NSK300学習ガイドの更新版がある場合、システムはそれを自動的にクライアントに送信します。それが、NSK300学習教材が非常に人気がある理由の1つであり、お客様により有利な価格とより多くのサービスを提供しています。

>> NSK300資料勉強 <<

ユニークなNSK300資料勉強 & 合格スムーズNSK300試験参考書 | 最高のNSK300日本語版トレーリング Netskope Certified Cloud Security Architect

変化する地域に対応するには、問題を解決する効率を改善する必要があります。これは、試験に対処するだけでなく、多くの側面を反映しています。 NSK300実践教材は、あなたがそれを実現するのに役立ちます。これらの時間に敏感な試験の受験者にとって、重要なニュースで構成される高効率のNSK300実際のテストは、最高の助けになります。定期的にそれらを練習することによってのみ、あなたはあなたに明らかな進歩が起こったのを見るでしょう。

Netskope NSK300 認定試験の出題範囲：

トピック
出題範囲

トピック 1

Cloud Threat Detection and Response: This article describes how to use Netskope in a cloud environment for threat hunting, investigation, and incident response.

トピック 2

Security Policy Management: One of the main competencies evaluated in this topic is the creation and management of granular security rules for cloud resources and applications.

トピック 3

Netskope Security Cloud Platform: It provides a thorough grasp of the architecture, deployment choices, and essential features of Netskope.

トピック 4

Cloud Security Concepts: This topic covers best practices, compliance requirements, and fundamental understanding of cloud security threats.

Netskope Certified Cloud Security Architect 認定 NSK300 試験問題 (Q10-Q15):

質問 # 10
You configured a pair of IPsec funnels from the enterprise edge firewall to a Netskope data plane. These tunnels have been implemented to steer traffic for a set of defined HTTPS SaaS applications accessed from end-user devices that do not support the Netskope Client installation. You discover that all applications steered through this tunnel are non-functional.
According to Netskope. how would you solve this problem?

A. Disable Perfect Forward Secrecy on the tunnel configuration.
B. Downgrade from IKE v2 to IKE v1.
C. Install the Netskope root and intermediate certificates on the end-user devices.
D. Restart the tunnel to stop the tunnel from flapping.

正解：C

解説：
When applications steered through an IPsec tunnel are non-functional, it is often due to the lack of proper trust establishment between the end-user devices and the Netskope data plane. The solution is to install the Netskope root and intermediate certificates on the end-user devices . This ensures that the devices recognize and trust the encrypted connection established by the IPsec tunnel, allowing the HTTPS SaaS applications to function correctly. Without these certificates, the devices may not be able to verify the security of the connection, leading to application failures.

質問 # 11
Your company just had a new Netskope tenant provisioned and you are asked to create a secure tenant configuration. In this scenario, which two default settings should you change? {Choose two.)

A. Change "Disallow concurrent logins by an Admin" to Enabled.
B. Change the No SNI setting to Block.
C. Change Safe Search to Disabled
D. Change Untrusted Root Certificate to Block.

正解：A、D

解説：
For a new Netskope tenant provisioned, to create a secure tenant configuration, you should consider changing the following default settings:
B . Change Untrusted Root Certificate to Block: This setting will ensure that any traffic coming from an untrusted root certificate is blocked, which is a critical security measure to prevent man-in-the-middle attacks and other types of cyber threats1.
D . Change "Disallow concurrent logins by an Admin" to Enabled: This setting will prevent multiple concurrent logins by the same admin account, which is an important security control to mitigate the risk of unauthorized access. If an admin's credentials are compromised, this setting will help limit the potential damage by ensuring that only one session can be active at a time1.
These changes are part of the recommended security hardening guidelines for Netskope tenants to enhance the overall security posture of the tenant environment.

質問 # 12
A company has deployed Explicit Proxy over Tunnel (EPoT) for their VDI users They have configured Forward Proxy authentication using Okta Universal Directory They have also configured a number of Real-time Protection policies that block access to different Web categories for different AD groups so. for example, marketing users are blocked from accessing gambling sites. During User Acceptance Testing, they see inconsistent results where sometimes marketing users are able to access gambling sites and sometimes they are blocked as expected They are seeing this inconsistency based on who logs into the VDI server first.
What is causing this behavior?

A. Forward Proxy authentication is configured but not enabled.
B. Forward Proxy is not configured to use the Cookie Surrogate
C. Forward Proxy is configured to use the Cookie Surrogate
D. Forward Proxy is not configured to use the IP Surrogate

正解：B

解説：
The inconsistent results observed during User Acceptance Testing (where marketing users sometimes access gambling sites and sometimes are blocked) are likely due to the configuration of the Forward Proxy.
Cookie Surrogate: The Cookie Surrogate is a mechanism used in Forward Proxy deployments to maintain user context across multiple requests. It ensures that user-specific policies are consistently applied even when multiple users share the same IP address (common in VDI environments).
Issue: If the Forward Proxy is not configured to use the Cookie Surrogate, it may lead to inconsistent behavior. When different users log into the VDI server, their requests may not be associated with their specific user context, resulting in varying policy enforcement.
Solution: Ensure that the Forward Proxy is properly configured to use the Cookie Surrogate, allowing consistent policy enforcement based on individual user identities. Reference:
Netskope Security Cloud Operation & Administration (NSCO&A) - Classroom Training Netskope Security Cloud Introductory Online Technical Training Netskope Architectural Advantage Features

質問 # 13
Your customer is currently using Directory Importer with Active Directory (AD) to provision users to Nelskope. They have recently acquired three new companies (A. B. and C) and want to onboard users from the companies onto the NetsKope platform. Information about the companies is shown below.
- Company A uses Active Directory.
-- Company B uses Azure AD.
-- Company C uses Okta Universal Directory.
Which statement is correct in this scenario?

A. Company A users cannot be provisioned to Netskope because the customer is already using AD Importer to import users from another Active Directory environment.
B. Either Company B or Company C users cannot be provisioned because integration with only one SCIM solution is allowed.
C. Users from Company B and Company C cannot be provisioned because the customer is already using AD Importer.
D. Users from Companies A. B, and C can be provisioned to Netskope by deploying additional AD Importers and integrating more than one SCIM solution.

正解：D

解説：
Users from Companies A, B, and C can indeed be provisioned to Netskope. Company A, which uses Active Directory, can continue to use the existing AD Importer. For Company B that uses Azure AD and Company C that uses Okta Universal Directory, integration with SCIM (System for Cross-domain Identity Management) solutions is possible.Netskope supports provisioning users from multiple directories, including Active Directory and cloud-based identity providers like Azure AD and Okta, by using additional AD Importers and integrating more than one SCIM solution12.
The correct approach for provisioning users from different companies that use various directory services is supported by Netskope's capabilities to integrate with multiple identity providers and directory services, as outlined in their documentation and community resources12.

質問 # 14
You recently began deploying Netskope at your company. You are steering all traffic, but you discover that the Real-time Protection policies you created to protect Microsoft OneDrive are not being enforced.
Which default setting in the Ul would you change to solve this problem?

A. Remove the default steering exception for domains.
B. Disable the default certificate-pinned application
C. Disable the default Microsoft appsuite SSL rule.
D. Remove the default steering exception for Cloud Storage.

正解：A

解説：
When deploying Netskope and steering all traffic, if you find that the Real-time Protection policies for Microsoft OneDrive are not being enforced, the likely issue is with the default steering exceptions. To resolve this, you should remove the default steering exception for domains . This is because the default exceptions may include domains related to Microsoft services, which could prevent the Real-time Protection policies from being applied to traffic directed towards OneDrive. By removing these exceptions, you ensure that all traffic, including that to OneDrive, is subject to the policies you have set up.
This recommendation is based on best practices for configuring Real-time Protection policies in Netskope, as outlined in their documentation, which suggests that exceptions should be carefully managed to ensure that security policies are enforced as intended

質問 # 15
......

人生にはあまりにも多くの変化および未知の誘惑がありますから、まだ若いときに自分自身のために強固な基盤を築くべきです。あなた準備しましたか。PassTestのNetskopeのNSK300試験トレーニング資料は最高のトレーニング資料です。IT職員としてのあなたは切迫感を感じましたか。PassTestを選んだら、成功への扉を開きます。頑張ってください。

NSK300試験参考書: https://www.passtest.jp/Netskope/NSK300-shiken.html

Mark Green Mark Green

Biography

ABOUT

Pages

Contact